Stupid & Disgusting Libtard Skank Holly O’Reilly Feels Entitled to Attack President Trump on Twitter

Stupid & Disgusting Libtard Skank Holly O'Reilly Feels Entitled to Attack President Trump on Twitter

Stupid & Disgusting Libtard Skank Holly O’Reilly Feels Entitled to Attack President Trump on Twitter

Stupid, disgusting & worthless libtard skank troll, Holly O’Reilly obviously feels that she is entitled by the US Constitution to attack the President of the United States on Twitter with all kinds of foul language, and even filed a lawsuit because the stupid fucking skank was blocked by President Trump from continuing to attack him on Twitter.

The stupid bitchbag, Holly O’Reilly, thinks that President Trump blocking her on Twitter is violating her constitutional rights by blocking the nasty libtard bitch on Twitter, because she believes that she has a constitutional right to post disturbing messages on President Trump’s personal Twitter account @RealDonaldTrump.

Why are liberals sooo fucking stupid? It has to be a mental defect or disease causing these stupid libtard fools to act they way they do.

No wonder why so many libtard assholes are on welfare, and don’t pay their taxes – they truly are mentally ill.

Songwriter Holly O’Reilly on Wednesday wrote an op-ed for the Washington Post in which she insisted that President Donald Trump blocking her on Twitter was an unconstitutional miscarriage of justice.

“President Trump is violating my constitutional rights by blocking me on Twitter,” O’Reilly wrote for the PostEverything Blog.

O’Reilly is one of two Twitter users represented by prominent First Amendment advocacy group the Knight Foundation, which sent a letter Tuesday demanding that Trump unblock them or face legal action.

O’Reilly regaled how she loves to tweet at the president to vent about her feelings. “It takes about five minutes out of my day to reply, and it makes me feel better knowing that this narcissistic, egomaniacal, misogynistic, xenophobic nightmare of a POTUS can read how I feel about him,” she wrote.

That all changed when she was blocked by Trump in May. “This is an elected official trying to silence an entire sector of the dissenting populace,” O’Reilly argued. “This is what dictators and fascists do. This isn’t what we do here in America.”

Elsewhere on the Washington Post, UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh blogged that he was skeptical of the argument that Trump blocking Twitter users was unconstitutional. He noted that Trump would be on solid ground if he claimed that the @RealDonaldTrump account was his personal Twitter, not a government forum.

Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org