Michael Bloomberg can try all he wants, but Bloomberg definitely can’t hide from his horrible “Stop & Frisk” policy in New York, which expanded during his term in office, and many say is the root cause of the destruction of the black family.

DEMOCRATS HATE BLACK PEOPLE – Bloomberg Can’t Hide From His ‘Stop & Frisk’ Policies That Destroyed Black Families

“Over time I’ve come to understand something that I’ve long struggled to admit to myself. I got something important really wrong. I didn’t understand that back then, the full impact that stops were having on the Black and Latino communities. I was totally focused on saving lives, but as we know, good intentions aren’t good enough. I want you to know that I realize back then I was wrong, and I’m sorry.”

In 2011, Bloomberg and the Democrat’s “Stop & Frisk policies had sent 685,724 people in New York were stopped and frisked, and a good amount of those 700K people were to prison. Of those 700K who were stopped and frisked in New York, 53 percent were black, 34 percent were Latino, and 9 percent were white.

Michael Bloomberg isn’t sorry for their Stop & Frisk policies. No, Bloomberg is only pretending to be sorry, so that black people might still vote for him – which I highly doubt will happen, as most black people hate Michael Bloomberg’s guts!

To prove that Bloomberg is only apologizing to the black population for their votes, Bloomberg actually stood up for his “Stop & Frink” policies earlier this year.

The truth is that Democrats hate black people – and Democrats wish that blacks were still their slaves and property they they could rape or kill – Period, end of story.

Over the weekend, Michael Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, reversed course on one of the defining issues of his mayoral term — the stop-and-frisk policies he supported and expanded during his term in office. Under stop-and-frisk, police searched hundreds of thousands of almost exclusively minority people on the street, looking for guns or drugs. A whopping 88% of the searches did not lead to an arrest, meaning that overwhelmingly, individuals who were stopped and assailed by police had done nothing wrong at all.

“Over time I’ve come to understand something that I’ve long struggled to admit to myself,” Bloomberg said, speaking to a crowd at a church in Brooklyn, New York. “I got something important really wrong. I didn’t understand that back then, the full impact that stops were having on the Black and Latino communities. I was totally focused on saving lives, but as we know, good intentions aren’t good enough. … I want you to know that I realize back then I was wrong, and I’m sorry.”

Notably, Bloomberg has been publicly teasing a 2020 run for the Democratic presidential nomination. While he was New York City’s chief executive, however — his term spanned from January 2002 to December 2013 — the number of stops per year ballooned into the hundreds of thousands, reaching a high of 685,724 in 2011 before declining to 191,851 in 2013. At the time, both police and the communities most affected protested that the policy was having disastrous consequences.

On Sunday, police union leader Patrick Lynch attacked the mayor’s apology, per the New York Post, saying that Bloomberg “could have saved himself this apology if he had just listened to the police officers on the street” at the time. “We said in the early 2000s that the quota-driven emphasis on street stops was polluting the relationship between cops and our communities,” Lynch added.

Stop-and-frisk was an extension of the “broken windows” theory of policing that came to prominence in New York under Rudy Giuliani, Bloomberg’s mayoral predecessor. That notion centered on the hypothesis that cracking down hard on small infractions could lead to drops in more serious crimes. In practice, though, it turned poor neighborhoods into dystopian surveillance states, where people could be stopped and searched by police after school or work without having done a single thing wrong.

Ramin Talaie/Corbis Historical/Getty Images
Even as crime began to drop precipitously in New York, Bloomberg refused to curtail stop-and-frisk, arguing that crime would rise again if he did. Damningly, after Bloomberg’s successor Mayor Bill de Blasio heavily cut back on stop-and-frisk, crime continued to fall.

“He was wrong because he never listened. He didn’t even acknowledge the validity of concerns, again as part of his often haughty nature,” de Blasio said in an interview with BuzzFeed News. While Bloomberg is mulling an entry into the 2020 race, de Blasio’s own run has already flamed out.

Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org