Charlie Kirk Assassination Coverage Still Leaves Many Unanswered Questions

There are still many unanswered questions regarding the political assassination of American Patriot Charlie Kirk, which need to be answered.

Lets start with the camera that captured the shooter’s escape from the UVU campus, which was manually moved to follow the shooter as he went out of frame.

  • Who was controling that camera?
  • How did the person operating the camera know which person on the UVU campus to follow?
  • Where exactly is the camera that filed the above video footage?

How about another camera? Why did someone take down a video camera mounted directly behind and above Charlie Kirk’s head, just minutes after Kirk was assassinated?

  • Who was the guy who took the camera down? Was he with Turning Point, the security, the campus?
  • Why was this camera allowed to be taken down soo quickly?
  • Why was the area not designated a crime scene immediately to prevent tampering?
  • Why did the guy taking down the camera look so nervous?
  • Will the video footage from that camera be made public

    • Was he with Turning Point, the security, the campus?

  • Was the video footage from that camera turned over to the FBI?
  • Will the video footage from that camera be made public
  • COULD THIS “CAMERA” HAVE BEEN A GUN THAT ACTUALLY SHOT CHARLIE KIRK FROM THE BACK OF HIS NECK?

The shooter’s “destroyed note” which apparently expressed his desire to “take out Charlie Kirk.”

“We have evidence to show what was in that note, which is, and I’m going to summarize basically saying, ‘I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it. That note was written before the shooting. Evidence of its existence, we now have learned, existed before the shooting, was in the location, in the suspect and partner’s home. But we have since learned that the note, even though it has been destroyed, we have found forensic evidence of the note, and we have confirmed what that note says because of our aggressive interview posture at the FBI.”

  • What is the evidense does the FBI have that Kirk’s shooter wrote a note that has been destroyed?
  • What information was contained in the destroyed note?
  • Who destroyed the shooter’s note?

Why do we not see anything that resembles a long gun in the video from when the shooter jumps down ffrom the roof?

  • Was obinson the actual shooter?
  • We initially read and heard that the gun was left on the roof, but then we are told it was found in the woods. Why the discrepency?
  • We have learned that the Mauser gun that was supposedly used is very hard to break down. Was it ever disassembled during the crime?
  • Was there forensics done to the weapon, like GSR, DNA and fingerprints?

Was there any forensics done at the scene of the assassination on the UVI campus?

  • Who secured the scene?
  • Are there pictures of the crime scene?
  • Where was most of the blood splatter from the moment of the bullet’s impact? In front of Kirk or behind?
  • Is there a hole from the bullet in the banner behind Kirk?

Did they ever find the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk? And if so,

  • Was the exact location of the bullet documented?
  • What is the exact location where the bullet was found?
  • Has any forensic testing of the bullet been done?
  • Does the spent bullet match the bolt-action gun they found in the woods?

What role did the shooter’s gay/trans lover relationship play in the assassination of Charlie Kirk?

  • Did the shooter’s trans boyfriend know about his plans to shoot Charlie Kirk?
  • Where was the shooter’s trans lover at the time when the shooting took place?

Why were there multiple books titled “The Shooting of Charlie Kirk” for sale on Amazon days before the shooting even happened?

  • Who authored and published this book, and how sis they know that Charlie Kirk was going to be assassinated?
  • Who is making money off these books?

Was Charlie Kirk’s assassin acting alone, or did he have accomplices to his crime?

  • It’s very hard to believe that the kid who assassinated Charlie Kirk acted alone!

How exactly did Charlie Kirk’s assassin get on the roof of the building?

  • The roof is way to hight to climb onto, so the shooter either needed an open door onto the roof, a ladder, which we haven’t heard any report about, or he needed help from someone else. Which one was it?

How did security once again fail to protect the rooftops that would make the easiest spot to take a shot from?

  • Was there any security preventing the shooter from gaining access to the roof of the buildings on campus?
  • It baffles the brain to know that the shitty “security” protecting Charlie Kirk apparently didn’t do anything to protect the rooftops – especially when it’s the same fucking situation in which President Trump was nearly assassinated!

Better quality video footage taken by the many UVU security cameras.

  • We have read that UVU has hundreds of cameras on campus that connect to their NVR system. Where is this video?

Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org