Can dishonest CNN fuck up any more stories and get any more untrustworthy? Definitely!

Untrustworthy CNN Pushes More Fake News Lies – Kremlin Asset Fabrication Debunked By the New York Times

CNN proves everyday that they can dig themselves into an ever deeper fake news hole with every word spoken on CNN’s bullshit fake news network, and now we have another completely fake story being pushed by the slimy bunch at CNN – that had to be debunked by the NYT of all people!

CNN’s Jim Sciutto blamed President Trump for the CIA being forced to exfiltrate a high-level covert Russian government asset from within Russia because, supposedly, the CIA was afraid that President Trump would reveal the source’s identity.

In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN.

A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.

“The decision to carry out the extraction occurred soon after a May 2017 meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump discussed highly classified intelligence with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. The intelligence, concerning ISIS in Syria, had been provided by Israel.” – Untrustworthy CNN Fake News liar Jim Sciutto

Here is the New York Times debunking the CNN story.

Decades ago, the C.I.A. recruited and carefully cultivated a midlevel Russian official who began rapidly advancing through the governmental ranks. Eventually, American spies struck gold: The longtime source landed an influential position that came with access to the highest level of the Kremlin.
…
The decision to extract the informant was driven “in part” because of concerns that Mr. Trump and his administration had mishandled delicate intelligence, CNN reported. But former intelligence officials said there was no public evidence that Mr. Trump directly endangered the source, and other current American officials insisted that media scrutiny of the agency’s sources alone was the impetus for the extraction.

…
But the government had indicated that the source existed long before Mr. Trump took office, first in formally accusing Russia of interference in October 2016 and then when intelligence officials declassified parts of their assessment about the interference campaign for public release in January 2017. News agencies, including NBC, began reporting around that time about Mr. Putin’s involvement in the election sabotage and on the C.I.A.’s possible sources for the assessment.

The following month, The Washington Post reported that the C.I.A.’s conclusions relied on “sourcing deep inside the Russian government.” And The New York Times later published articles disclosing details about the source.

The news reporting in the spring and summer of 2017 convinced United States government officials that they had to update and revive their extraction plan, according to people familiar the matter.

CNN SUCKS DICK! CNN seriously couldn’t get even the most simple weather story correct – as the CNN liars would be compelled to add in a few lies so they feel better and more in control.

CNN recently touted a bombshell report, only to be debunked by The New York Times. The cable network issued a story Monday, claiming the CIA brought a long-time Kremlin asset home in 2017. CNN cited concerns surrounding President Trump’s handling of confidential information.

However, The New York Times later came out with its own version of the story, saying the CIA offered to extract the asset before President Trump took office. The spy rejected the offer in 2016, but eventually decided to come home in 2017 in response to the media’s fixation on the Russian collusion hoax.

Even other commentators on CNN questioned the accuracy of the reporting from their own network.

“I question whether this angle of this story, about whether the president’s engagement with intelligence was actually a spur in the extraction of the informant, I suspect there are other issues here. What they do say is suspicion about how the president looks at intelligence generally,North Korea, Syria, etc. — he’s suspicious.” – — Phil Mudd, analyst – CNN

Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org