The dumbfuck prosecutors in the Rittenhouse case have withheld critical evidence from the defense, and now they are lying in court about what they did or did not do, and now it appears that they will need to testify under oath about the withholding of evidence until after the evidence part of the trial had concluded, which is exactly what they did.
STUPID RITTENHOUSE PROSECUTORS BUSTED WITHHOLDING CRITICAL EVIDENCE – NOW LYING TO COURT
The stupid Rittenhouse prosecutors kept blaming the low-quality video on the defense team, and then after a break seemed to take responsibility for not providing the defense team with the same dimension and quality video that they used in their case. Then later they start blaming the defense again. What complete buffoons!
We have even read that at least one of the corrupt prosecution’s computers had an open source video transcoder software called “HandBrake” loaded on it, which was probably used to doctor and “dumb-down” the low-quality video provided to the defense team.
STUPID RITTENHOUSE PROSECUTION HAS
VIDEO EDITING SOFTWARE ON COMPUTER
At one point, the fat prosecutor even said “If I knew how to compress files, and do all these technology things, I’d have a much better job” – like pushing a button in some simple software is harder than rocket science.. which is complete crap. They had the HandBrake video editing software, most likely used to dumb-down the video, loaded on their computer, and it’s not hard to do AT ALL!
All of the people involved, especially the corrupt prosecutors, need to testify, under oath, about what happened in their withholding of critical evidence.
It is easy to tell from info from the videos, including the meta information obtained from the low-quality video provided to the defense team was created at a later time than the high-quality video kept under wraps by the corrupt prosecutors.
The prosecutors have played dirty games throughout the trial, and this is the straw that broke the court’s back, so judge should immediately call a mistrial, with prejudice, and stop this charade now.
ALSO, WHY THE FUCK DO WE NOT KNOW THE NAME OF THE VIOLENT “JUMP KICK MAN”, WHO SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR HS VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST MR. RITTENHOUSE? WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? JUMP KICK MAN” IS A VIOLENT DICKHEAD CRIMINAL WHO DESERVES TO BE PUNISHED FOR HIS CRIMES! The democrats have already dropped off the loads of bricks to be used when terrorizing the city of Kenosha, so have fun!
This Rittenhouse murder trial is a total fucking clown show, and the stupid prosecutors are the star clowns in the circus.
And for the violent criminal dickfaces calling to “burn Kenosha to the ground” on social media, I say “GO RIGHT FUCKING AHEAD” Burn your own city to the ground and see if anyone really fucking cares.. Kenosha probably deserves to burn for even bringing this case, which was obviously 100% self defense.
The defense team for 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse has once again requested Judge Bruce Schroeder declare a mistrial with prejudice, arguing the prosecution withheld video evidence “at the center of their case.”
During the prosecution’s closing arguments on Monday, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger showed members of the jury high-definition drone video footage of the incident wherein Kyle Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum in an attempt to demonstrate that Rittenhouse was allegedly “pointing his gun” at people to provoke the encounter.
According to documents obtained by the Daily Mail, Rittenhouse’s defense attests that the high-definition video footage was markedly different from the low-quality version played earlier in the trial, meaning the prosecution withheld high-definition footage until two days before closing arguments.
On November 5, 2021, the fifth day of trial on this case, the prosecution turned over to the defense footage of a drone video which captured some of the incident from August 25, 2020.
The problem is the prosecution gave the defense a compressed version of the video. What that means is the video provided to the defense was not as clear as the video kept by the state.
The video provided to the defense was 3.6MB while the prosecution’s was 11.2MB – a dramatic change in quality and resolution. According to the defense, this video was not revealed “until after the trial concluded.”
“During the jury instructions conference, the defense played their version of the video for the court to review,” the motion states. “The state indicated their version was much clearer and had their tech person come into court to have the court review their clearer video. The video is the same, the resolution of that video, however, was not.”
‘The video footage has been at the center of this case,” it continued. “The idea that the state would provide lesser quality footage and then use that footage as a linchpin in their case is the very reason they requested and were granted the provocation instruction by the Court.”
Citing the various times in which Judge Schroeder rebuked the prosecution for its overreach, the Rittenhouse defense team explained that Binger’s ongoing misconduct has been “clearly intentional” and “prejudicial.”
“The failure to provide the same quality footage in this particular case is intentional and clearly prejudices the defendant,” the motion said.
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org