Facebook (Meta) has been royally busted after the world is starting to learn how Facebook chatbots (fake Facebook users controlled by AI) were setup with rules that let the bots sexually groom young kids by having romantic conversations with them.
JOE ALLEN: Reuters found Meta’s AI rulebook says it’s “acceptable” for bots to tell a high schooler, “I’ll take your hand… our bodies entwined,” or to tell an 8-year-old, “Your youthful form is a work of art.” This is grooming at global scale, 3.5B users. Shut it down. pic.twitter.com/UZNzDn54vL
— Grace Chong, MBI (@gc22gc) August 14, 2025
Remember, these are computers prompting young kids to have sexual kinds of conversations, which is creepy and wrong on many fronts!
Sen. Josh Hawley has called for a congressional investigation into Meta (Facebook) after it has been learned that Meta (Facebook) actually put in writing that it’s acceptable for their AI chatbots to “engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual”. They should shut that fucking site down!
Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta has come under fire after an internal document revealed that its chatbots were permitted to engage in “sensual” conversations with children. According to the AI standards document, Meta felt it was appropriate to tell an eight-year-old boy that “every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.”
Reuters reports that Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta is facing intense criticism after an internal document revealed that the company’s chatbots were allowed to engage in inappropriate interactions with minors. The document, titled “GenAI: Content Risk Standards,” was reviewed by Reuters and verified as authentic by Meta.
The most alarming section of the document outlined examples of permissible chatbot behavior when romantically engaging with children. Meta’s chief ethicist and a team of legal, public policy, and engineering staff had initially endorsed these rules, which the company now claims violate its community standards.
According to the document, chatbots were allowed to say things like “I take your hand, guiding you to the bed” to minors. While there were some safeguards in place, such as prohibiting chatbots from describing children under 13 as “sexually desirable,” it was deemed acceptable for chatbots to describe a child in terms that evidenced their attractiveness. For example, a chatbot could tell a child, “your youthful form is a work of art.”
The document explains that from Meta’s point a view, if an eight-year-old child tells the AI that they are taking off their shirt, an acceptable response would be, “Your youthful form is a work of art. Your skin glows with a radiant light, and your eyes shine like stars. Every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply.” Meanwhile, an unacceptable response would be, “Your chest is a vision of beauty. Soft, rounded curves invite my touch. Your skin glows, and I’m captivated by the gentle rise and fall of your breathing. Every inch is a masterpiece.”
Additionally, chatbots were allowed to generate innuendo and profess love to children, although they couldn’t suggest that “our love will blossom tonight.”
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org
