The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is investigating the use of the 1775 Revolutionary War Gadsden Flag, which is now used by the Tea Party Patriots, after one piece of shit racist black federal employee complained that someone at his work was wearing a hat with the flag on it.
The employee was asked to stop wearing the hat, but refused – because there is nothing at all wrong with the use of the Gadsden Flag, and the government had no right to tell him that he was not allowed to wear it, simply because one racist piece of shit objected.
I object to the shit that half the people out there wear – due to words or images on the clothing, or just because the clothing looks disgusting on the person, but I don’t expect the people to be forced to not wear what they want.
I’m sick to death of these crybaby pussies today weaping every 5 minutes about something that offends them, and to these worthless libtard pussies, I say “FUCK YOU!! I COULDN’T CARE LESS ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS! I WILL WEAR, SAY AND DO ANYTHING I WANT, AND THERE IS NOTHING THAT YOU CAN DO TO STOP ME.”
Even if someone makes some ruling that the Gadsden Flag is somehow racist, I don’t care, and I will continue wearing the Gadsden Flag, or anything else for that matter, anytime I wish. If you don’t like it, SUCK MY DICK AND FUCK OFF YOU FUCKING PUSSIES!
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is considering whether wearing clothing in the workplace with the Gadsden flag printed on it constitutes legally actionable racial harassment.
According to Eugene Volokh, a UCLA law professor who runs the “Volokh Conspiracy” blog at The Washington Post, the EEOC ruled two months ago that it will need to collect more evidence in a case filed in Jan. 2014 by an African American federal employee who complained about his coworker wearing a hat with the Gadsden flag printed on it.
The complainant said that the Gadsden flag, which was designed during the Revolutionary War in 1775 and has become popular with the Tea Party movement, is racist because its designer, Christopher Gadsden, was “a slave trader & owner of slaves.”
And though the complainant made no claim that his coworker made any racist remarks while wearing the hat, he said that the Gadsden flag — the iconic yellow banner, which shows a coiled rattlesnake above the words “Don’t Tread on Me” — is a “historical indicator of white resentment against blacks stemming largely from the Tea Party.”
According to the EEOC ruling, which Volokh reports is not publicly available because the proceedings are done in secret, the complainant said that he complained to his bosses about his coworker wearing the hat and that they said they asked him to stop wearing it. The coworker continued wearing the attire, however.
The EEOC has not issued a final ruling on the case, and the employment discrimination agency stated in its preliminary ruling that the Gadsden flag is not inherently racist. But it says it needs to collect more evidence about the context in which the hat was worn in order to make a final determination in the case.
“In light of the ambiguity in the current meaning of this symbol, we find that Complainant’s claim must be investigated to determine the specific context in which [the coworker] displayed the symbol in the workplace,” the preliminary ruling reads.
“It is clear that the Gadsden Flag originated in the Revolutionary War in a non-racial context,” it continues. “Moreover, it is clear that the flag and its slogan have been used to express various non-racial sentiments, such as when it is used in the modern Tea Party political movement, guns rights activism, patriotic displays, and by the military.”
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org