ABC News and George Stephanopoulos seem to have conspired to help Bill & Hillary Clinton coverup the many damming controversies surrounding them, and even work to throw watchdogs off the scent of Hillary’s brother and other extended family who have benefited from Bill & Hillary’s positions in the government.

Publicly, the corrupt liberals running the ABC network have been defending the unbelievable and shockingly stupid actions of George Stephanopoulos. ABC has all but said that George Stephanopoulos not disclosing the at least $75,000 dollars he donated to the Clinton Foundation, while defending the Clintons corrupt actions at every possible opportunity on ABC News air.

George Stephanopoulos is a piece of crap liberal crony of Bill & Hillary Clinton and he cannot and should not be trusted. I would bet just about anything that Stephanopoulos has actually given more money that the $75,000 we know about, and the money he has given the Clinton Foundation is probably just the tip of the iceberg. The members of the conservative media need to do some hardcore investigating into Stephanopoulos, and see what other corrupt groups he has donated to.

• How much money did George Stephanopoulos give to Voter Fraud groups like ACORN, who work to undermine our election system with fraud?
• How much money did George Stephanopoulos give to Islamic hate terrorist groups who want to kill as many Americans as they can?
• How much money has George Stephanopoulos given to radical legal groups who defend and support Islamic jihadists and other terrorists?
• How much money did George Stephanopoulos give to environmental extremist groups, who lie about the existence of man-made Global Warming and use other environmental scare tactics to control people and make themselves rich?
• How much money has George Stephanopoulos given to George Soros hate groups, which are mostly designed to bring about the downfall of America?

We also need people to look into if and how much secret money George Stephanopoulos has been given to be a shill liar for these corrupt politicians and their cronies? I would bet just about anything I own that George Stephanopoulos has been paid off hansomely by the Clintons and others that he lies for on ABC News.

Millions of people already have turned off ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, and others because the majority of the American People know that these networks are just media arms of Obama and the Democrats, and they will never tell you the truth if it makes liberals look bad. These networks are in the Democrat’s back pockets, and I would be utterly shocked if many of these corrupt so-called journalists are not being paid off by the Democrats.

Boycott ABC and all other liberal run networks that cannot be trusted.
Turn on FOX news, if you want to hear the truth.

My, my, the bigger they are, the dumber they think we are.

Dan Rather of CBS was toppled by a phony document scam. Lyin’ Brian Williams at NBC casually mixed fact with self-aggrandizing fiction. Now George Stephanopoulos is caught in a Clinton web of deceit at ABC.

The hat trick of arrogant anchor scandals helps explain why Americans don’t trust network news. With apologies to Walter Cronkite, that’s the way it is, and the way it is stinks.

Stephanopoulos shares with Rather and Williams the rotten distinction of fessing up only after being exposed by real journalists. In his case, the Washington Free Beacon uncovered his secret donations to the Clinton Foundation and contacted ABC for a response.

That was the honorable thing to do — get the other side of the story before publishing it. But Stephanopoulos ditched his journalistic veneer and reverted to his Clinton White House roots by quickly leaking the info to what he regarded as a more friendly news outlet, Politico.

His track record of secrecy, partisanship and dishonorable behavior blows up his claim that he made an honest mistake. He engaged in a prolonged and brazen act of dishonesty.

Over three years, he gave at least $75,000 to an organization that acts like a political super PAC for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and a tax-free slush fund for the Clinton family and their cronies.

Through their opaque foundation, the Clintons have financial ties to repressive regimes and shady individuals around the world, pocketing many, many millions for themselves. Yet apparently starting when Hillary was secretary of state, Stephanopoulos made common cause with his former bosses and in the process destroyed any credibility he built as a news anchor and moderator for ABC.

He made two unforgivable decisions: He didn’t tell his bosses about the donations and he didn’t tell viewers that he had given money to the foundation even as he reported on it and the Clintons.

At most news organizations, either would be a fireable offense. Either would be a fireable offense at ABC for someone less important.

But he may be too big to fire, at least quickly, so the network’s defense of him could be a trial balloon to gauge the fallout.

Even a brief tally of recent offenses makes a compelling case. On April 26, Stephanopoulos grilled Peter Schweizer, the author of the sensational “Clinton Cash,” pressing him to admit the book contains no “smoking gun.”

The implication was that, if it’s not indictable, it’s not important. That’s a legal test, not a journalistic or political one, yet Stephanopoulos cleverly used that standard to give the Clintons the all-clear.

The anchor also cited Schweizer’s “partisan interest,” noting that Schweizer was a speechwriter for President George W. Bush.

But as a columnist in the Washington Post noted at the time, Stephanopoulos never told viewers that he had worked for the Clintons and had defended them in many scandals. Like the Clintons themselves, he acted as if the rules only apply to others.

Two days later, Jon Stewart had Stephanopoulos on his show to talk about news coverage and the Clinton Foundation. To watch a video of the segment is to wonder whether Stephanopoulos fears Stewart knows about the contributions and will bring them up. The lack of disclosure now makes Stewart look like a chump.

Indeed, every story Stephanopoulos has ever done about the Clintons, their critics and other politicians is now suspect. What did he make of her vanishing emails? Benghazi? Her entire tenure at State? What did he say about her Republican opponents?

To suggest, as Stephanopoulos and ABC do, that disclosing the contributions would have meant going “the extra mile” is preposterous.

Disclosing something so fundamental is not extra. It’s basic. High school newspapers have stricter conflict-of-interest rules.

Almost as egregious, ABC’s “punishment” is that Stephanopoulos will not take part in a GOP debate. Big whoop. It misses the point, as does the New York Times’ coverage highlighting Republican complaints.

The breach is clearly partisan, but that is secondary. First and foremost, it is a disqualifying violation of professional ethics, and trying to remedy it by setting partisan boundaries compounds the mess.

Are we supposed to trust Stephanopoulos on some stories but not others? Will ABC put a graphic on the screen to signal when their man is playing it straight?

Hillary Clinton’s Democratic rivals also are victimized by his conflicts. All other journalists at ABC, some of whom are dependent on Stephanopoulos for air time, are tainted by his donations.

ABC needs to face the truth. Stephanopoulos has forfeited all trust as a newsman, period, end of story.

Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org