The brainless libtards dumb-fucks are soo pissed off and butt-hurt that Donald J. Trump won the election that they have now invented a new term “fake news” that will use to try and destroy conservative media and websites.
For the third time since September, Facebook is disclosing new measurement errors. The two new errors affected the reaction counts Facebook reports on Pages’ Live videos, as well as the engagement figures Facebook reports for off-Facebook links; the latter link engagement metrics were recently used in investigations by BuzzFeed and The New York Times into fake news articles’ performance on Facebook.
Does ANYONE really think that this was a “mistake” as Facebook claims? We certainly don’t, and wouldn’t put it past the libtard losers at Facebook to intentionally, probably at the request of the Democrats, aid in attacking conservative media.
Who the FUCK are these assholes to tell me what is fake and not, especially when at least half of the shit that is on the liberal media networks and websites is the most fake crap out there?
Look at the coverage of the 2016 election on CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, LA Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, and many other liberal biased media outlets and you will see that these jackasses traffic in fake news all day, but it’s only when the Democrats lose the biggest and most important election in modern history that they all of the sudden come up with this straw man to attack, which is really just a way to gain support for attacking and bringing down conservative media.
Even if I wanted to write a fake news story, there is not a damn thing that they can do about it, and there is little chance in hell that the democrats will be able to change the constitution to take away our 2nd amendment rights to say or write anything we damn well please!
Honestly, these stupid and corrupt Democrat pieces of shit can go fuck themselves!
Conservatives are waking up to the corruption of the Democrats and will not allow these fucking idiots to infringe on our 2nd amendment rights, no matter what they call it.
THE PHRASE “FAKE NEWS” has exploded in usage since the election, but the term is similar to other malleable political labels such as “terrorism” and “hate speech”; because the phrase lacks any clear definition, it is essentially useless except as an instrument of propaganda and censorship. The most important fact to realize about this new term: those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
One of the most egregious examples was the recent Washington Post article hyping a new anonymous group and its disgusting blacklist of supposedly pro-Russia news outlets – a shameful article mindlessly spread by countless journalists who love to decry Fake News, despite the Post article itself being centrally based on Fake News. (The Post this week finally added a lame editor’s note acknowledging these critiques; the Post editors absurdly claimed that they did not mean to “vouch for the validity” of the blacklist even though the article’s key claims were based on doing exactly that).
Now we have an even more compelling example. Back in October, when WikiLeaks was releasing emails from the John Podesta archive, Clinton campaign officials and their media spokespeople adopted a strategy of outright lying to the public, claiming – with no basis whatsoever – that the emails were doctored or fabricated and thus should be ignored. That lie – and that is what it was: a claim made with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for its truth – was most aggressively amplified by MSNBC personalities such as Joy Ann Reid and Malcolm Nance, The Atlantic’s David Frum, and Newsweek’s Kurt Eichenwald.
That the emails in the Wikileaks archive were doctored or faked – and thus should be disregarded – was classic Fake News, spread not by Macedonian teenagers or Kremlin operatives but by established news outlets such as MSNBC, the Atlantic and Newsweek. And, by design, this Fake News spread like wildfire all over the internet, hungrily clicked and shared by tens of thousands of people eager to believe it was true. As a result of this deliberate disinformation campaign, anyone reporting on the contents of the emails was instantly met with claims that the documents in the archive had been proven fake.
The most damaging such claim came from MSNBC’s intelligence analyst Malcolm Nance. As I documented on October 11, he tweeted what he – for some bizarre reason – labeled an “Official Warning.” It decreed: “#PodestaEmails are already proving to be riddled with obvious forgeries & #blackpropaganda not even professionally done.” That tweet was re-tweeted by more than 4,000 people. It was vested with added credibility by Clinton-supporting journalists like Reid and Frum (“expert to take seriously”).
All of that, in turn, led to an article in something called “The Daily News Bin” with the headline: “MSNBC intelligence expert: WikiLeaks is releasing falsified emails not really from Hillary Clinton.” This classic fake news product – citing Nance and Reid among others – was shared more than 40,000 times on Facebook alone.
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org