WOW Buried in the 1500 page spending bill is a 40% PAY INCREASE FOR CONGRESS & PROTECTIONS FOR J6 CRIMINALS! ANY TREASONOUS REPUBLICAN WHO VOTES FOR THIS SPENDING BILL WILL HAVE A MUSK-FUNDED PRIMARY CHALLENGER IN THEIR NEXT ELECTION!
🚨The Dems are eating themselves alive:
CNN Reporter: “People look at the performance of Congress and say ‘Why should we give them more money?’”
Senator Durbin: “What about the media?… Half of your listeners are not there anymore and you’re still getting the same paycheck.” pic.twitter.com/m7k4q8euRG
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) December 18, 2024
Dick Durbin is such a worthless prick!! You are all overpaid as it is, and then he tries to equate their pay to that of the fake news media. Fucking criminal grifters!
“It’s a total dumpster fire. I think it’s garbage!” – Rep. Eric Burlison
“Any member of the House or Senate who votes for this outrageous spending bill deserves to be voted out in 2 years!”- Elon Musk
Speaker Johnson's 1,547-page spending monstrosity has a little gift to Pelosi's Partisan J6 Committee.
Buried way down in section 605 is a passage that would shield House members from independent investigators.
"MOTIONS TO QUASH OR MODIFY—Upon a motion made promptly by a House… pic.twitter.com/3XH92bFT1l
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) December 18, 2024
A “Continuing Resolution” whose purpose is supposedly to keep the government open is 1,500+ pages long & full of indefensible baggage:
– 72 pages worth of “Pandemic Preparedness and Response” policy
– Renewal of the "Global Engagement Center," a key player in federal censorship
-…— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) December 18, 2024
Speaker Johnson’s 1,547-page spending monstrosity has a little gift to Pelosi’s Partisan J6 Committee.
Buried way down in section 605 is a passage that would shield House members from independent investigators.
“MOTIONS TO QUASH OR MODIFY—Upon a motion made promptly by a House office or provider for a House office, a court of competent jurisdiction shall quash or modify any legal process directed to the provider for a House office if compliance with the legal process would require the disclosure of House data of the House office.”
What does this mean in plain English?
If someone (like a House office or a service provider working for a House office) believes a legal request for information (such as a subpoena) would force them to disclose sensitive House data, they can quickly file a motion with a court to stop or change the request.
The court must agree to block or change the request if it would result in the disclosure of the House’s sensitive data.
In essence, this ensures House offices’ data remains protected, and provides a way to challenge legal requests for that data.
This could be used to shield J6 committee members accused of deleting records and may be criminally prosecuted under the Trump administration.
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org