The New York Times had the details of the Harvey Weinstein sex scandal since way back in 2004 or before, but hid it from the American People because Harvey Weinstein was one of their own breed of corrupt libtards.
Why did the New York Times finally break the Weinstein Sex Scandal story after decades of sitting on it, and keeping it hidden?
The answer to why the New York Times decided to finally out one of the worst sexual predators we have ever seen, at this particular point in time, was to save themselves.
The New York Times didn’t WANT TO release the Weinstein Sexual Predator story, they HAD TO!
The NYT knew that James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas was about to release some undercover video of a former Democratic campaign operative named Nicholas Dudich, doing work for the New York Times, who was caught on hidden-camera bragging about his lack of journalistic ethics.
“I will be ‘objective.’ No, I’m not. That’s why I’m there. Like, after the Clinton campaign, I’m like, no I need to get back into news and keep doing shit because, like, this isn’t going to change.”
The piece of shit also talks about what he would do to hurt President Trump.
“I’d target his businesses, his dumb fuck of a son, Donald Jr., and Eric…
“Target that. Get people to boycott going to his hotels. Boycott… So a lot of the Trump brands, if you can ruin the Trump brand and you put pressure on his business and you start investigating his business and you start shutting it down, or they’re hacking or other things. He cares about his business more than he cares about being President. He would resign. Or he’d lash out and do something incredibly illegal, which he would have to.”
This is the kind of people that are shaping the libard-run fake news that flows freely from the Old Grey Liar on a daily basis, and they definitely cannot be trusted.
The New York Times may have done a good thing to FINALLY shed some light on the sexual predator in their midst, but they have done a disservice to these country and the Weinstein-abused women by keeping their dirty little secret hidden for decades, and the only reason why the New York Times went with the Weinstein story is because they needed something sensational enough to draw attention away from their own problems.
In a video announcement released on September 18th, Project Veritas founder and guerrilla journalist James O’Keefe warned his organization was currently operating one of the biggest ever investigations into the mainstream media’s ‘holy grail,’ promising media people will likely lose their jobs over the imminent exposé.
O’Keefe hinted he was targeting the New York Times in a cryptic tweet he sent out on August 7th.
The very next day on October 5th, The New York Times blew the roof off of the decades long ‘open secret’ in Hollywood that Harvey Weinstein was essentially a sexual predator who preyed on young starlets. Weinstein reportedly paid off several sexual harassment accusers over the years.
An investigation by The New York Times found previously undisclosed allegations against Mr. Weinstein stretching over nearly three decades, documented through interviews with current and former employees and film industry workers, as well as legal records, emails and internal documents from the businesses he has run, Miramax and the Weinstein Company.
During that time, after being confronted with allegations including sexual harassment and unwanted physical contact, Mr. Weinstein has reached at least eight settlements with women, according to two company officials speaking on the condition of anonymity.
The New York Times had the story all the way back in 2004 and squashed it after Weinstein himself appeared at the NYT headquarters and muscled the paper into silence, so now all of a sudden they are eager to throw the producer under the bus and open the flood gates? The timing is very suspicious.
Since this bombshell story was published last Thursday, there has been a slow drip of stories on Weinstein.
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org