The “hacked” Democrat emails that doomed Hillary Clinton’s chances of being elected were not actually hacked at all, and certainly not by the Russians as the Democrats and the Media are claiming. Instead, the emails were LEAKED from someone inside the Democrat party.

The often repeated claim that Russia hacked Hillary Clinton and the Democrats to help Donald Trump win the election is just another “Fake News” lie created by the Democrats to provide more excuses for their historical election loss, and to try and delegitimize Trump’s win.

I can tell you this much – It’s NOT going to work!

Everyone living in the United States knows that 99% of the stupid drivel that comes out of the mouths of Democrats and the corrupt media are lies and falsehoods designed to make themselves look better while trying to undermine the Electoral College landslide victory of President-Elect Donald J. Trump over Hillary Clinton.

Center for Security Policy Executive Vice President Jim Hanson called the CIA’s claim that the Russians hacked the Democrats to help Donald Trump “A Joke”, because there is no way in hell that the CIA knows the real reason why Hillary and the DNC emails were leaked, unless they have spoken with the leaker inside the Democrat party.

“You can tell politicized intelligence immediately when they attribute motive to someone, rather than actions. Because the last thing you can tell, the hardest piece of intelligence, is to tell why something happened. You can tell what happened. You can say the results of what happened. When you say someone did something because of this, or for this reason, you’re projecting your thoughts into their heads, and that’s not possible. So it’s kind of a joke.”

Even former UN Ambassador John Bolton even thinks that blaming the leaked DNC/Clinton emails may be a “False Flag” operation by our government, which I would never put past the corrupt Democrats.

“I think that, if you’re outside the circle of intelligence that’s looked at this, it’s very hard to know, but — what the answer is. But I think it’s at least a question to be asked, whether or not this was a false flag operation with some foreign government other than Russia.”

I agree that we do need to have investigations into the hacking of Hillary Clinton’s illegal email server and the DNC, and Hillary Clinton needs to be held accountable for her crimes against the United States and the American People, and if needed, the DNC leaker should also be held accountable for leaking the emails.

One thing is for sure – with the knowledge that the leaked emails provided, the American People made a much more informed decision when they went to the polls on November 8th, and Hillary was already help partially accountable for her crimes by losing the election. If Hillary Clinton wasn’t criminally corrupt, her leaked emails would not have hurt her in the election, but the truth is that Hillary Clinton’s own crimes and corruption doomed her chances.

The 2016 election loss is nobody’s fault but Hillary and the Democrats, and Russia had absolutely NOTHING to do with the landslide victory for Trump.

Anyone who tells you differently is a liar.

The liberal media have been playing up a report by the Central Intelligence Agency that hackers aligned with the Russian government had allegedly provided Julian Assange with the hacked emails his website WikiLeaks published during the fall, but a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan is going public again to blow the story out of the water.

“As [WikiLeaks founder] Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians,” former Ambassador Craig Murray wrote on his blog Monday morning, adding that he had direct access to the original source. “As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks — there is a major difference between the two …

“Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access? Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it is not Russia are those who do have access.”

Moreover, where the hacks originated had no real bearing on what they had revealed, which was that both the Democrat Party and failed Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton were corrupt.

“(I)f Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie … had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie … had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton Foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence … had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people,” then perhaps she would have won, Murray added.

It felt as if the lightning-speed spread of this unconfirmed Russian hacker conspiracy among liberal media outlets was therefore nothing more than an attempt by liberal Democrats and their media sycophants to deflect blame for Clinton’s epic loss.

Murray’s post was the second time in two days that a former ambassador had cast doubt on the theory.

Speaking Sunday on CBS News, John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United States, said the conspiracy theory might even be a potential “false flag.”

“It is not at all clear to me, just viewing this from the outside, that this hacking into the DNC and the RNC computers was not a false flag operation,” he said, implying that the Obama administration was working in tandem with the liberal media to mislead the public to distract them from other things.

As for Assange and officials in Russia, both have reportedly denied allegations they they conspired to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.

“The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia,” The Guardian reported Sunday.

And Murray, who has been vocal before about the claim of Russian involvement, minced no words about where he placed the blame for the latest spin on the election.

“It is terrible that the prime conduit for this paranoid nonsense is a once great newspaper, the Washington Post, which far from investigating executive power, now is a sounding board for totally evidence free anonymous source briefing of utter bullshit from the executive, he wrote

Please share this story on Facebook and Twitter and let us know what you think about former Ambassadors Craig Murray and John Bolton both dismissing claims that Russian hackers interfered with the presidential election!

Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy – usbacklash.org